Compare campaigns

Compare campaigns

Read the claims and horizons together. Shared instruments alone do not imply a conflict.

← All campaigns

AI power: generation and grid equipment

AI electricity demand will sustain generation and grid-equipment orders as supply expands slowly; contracted demand must convert into deliveries and supplier earnings.

Why now
GE Vernova’s latest quarter provides order and delivery evidence, while Constellation’s future commitments support demand. Campus financing and power availability still need individual proof.
In scope
Generation equipment, grid interconnection and transmission equipment · Power contracts and delivered electricity, with dates and cancellation terms
Out of scope
Rack, board and die power conversion · AI-cloud financing as an automatic beneficiary · Nuclear fuel and pre-commercial reactor equity
Expected horizon
12–36 months; test order quality and delivery conversion at each quarterly release.
What supports it
Booked orders convert to shipments with stable or improving segment economics · Signed power commitments survive financing and interconnection milestones
What would break it
Order cancellations or deferrals persist across two quarterly reports while segment margins deteriorate · New usable power supply removes the constraint before the expected order conversion
Curated instrumentsGEVCEGVSTTLNPWR

Next review 2026-10-28 · Read GE Vernova's third-quarter release (scheduled 2026-10-28 before the open, provider estimate): orders, equipment backlog, shipments and segment margins judged separately from bookings, with any cancellation or deferral named; read Quanta's report (2026-10-29) for grid-construction backlog conversion in the same pass. Before it, link the October 6 Constellation–Google 20-year agreement (890 MW of new PJM capacity, including uprate investment) from an issuer or primary source, and obtain primary PJM 2028/29 capacity-auction results and the FERC action on PJM's reliability backstop, which Talen's coverage cites only through aggregator pages. Earlier on a material equipment cancellation, a power-contract amendment, an adverse ERCOT Batch Zero determination for a tracked project (eligibility report stated for 2026-12-10), or a verified behind-the-meter commissioning that supplies usable load ahead of grid conversion.

Research ideas

All 0 ideas →

Issued calls · returns compare the symbol with SPY after 30 and 90 days. Positive excess supports a BUY; negative excess supports TRIM or SELL. WAIT and research ideas have no score. These are call outcomes, not a campaign return.

Entry and invalidationHorizon / review30 days90 days
CEGWAIT2026-10-09 · openOriginal call

A pullback that holds above the 200-day average ($286.14 at the Oct 9 close) while RSI cools below 55, then a settled close above $300.40, the October 6 close on the Google agreement

Invalidation: A settled close below the 200-day average ($286.14 at the Oct 9 close), or a third-quarter report (expected around Nov 9, provider date) that does not confirm the Google agreement's terms

Not recordedReview 2026-11-13
Not gradedNot graded
BEWAIT2026-08-28 · openOriginal call

holds the 200-day average at $188.51

Invalidation: a weekly close below $188.51

Not recordedReview 2026-09-25
Not gradedNot graded
MKSIWAIT2026-08-28 · openOriginal call

reclaims its 200-day average at $259.70 with RSI back above 45

Invalidation: a weekly close more than 5% below the 200-day

Not recordedReview 2026-09-25
Not gradedNot graded
CEGWAIT2026-07-19 · resolved:closedOriginal call

reclaim the 20-day (~$256) with hyperscaler spending language intact on the Jul 29–30 prints

Invalidation: capex language softens and the July shelf breaks — then the contracted-electrons bid is repricing too

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
GEVWAIT2026-07-19 · resolved:closedOriginal call

held the AI unwind at −5%; reclaim the 20-day (~$1,085) and print a higher low

Invalidation: loses the July low — the complement bid was narrower than the month suggested

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
LEUWAIT2026-07-19 · openOriginal call

first higher low after a clean Jul 29–30 capex read — the −18% month is a beta markdown, and the entry is print-gated, not chart-gated

Invalidation: lower lows after capex language holds firm — then the fuel-cycle derate is regime, not beta

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
CCJWAIT2026-07-17 · openOriginal call

washed out at RSI 30 — wait for the $84 shelf to hold and a first higher low; the 50-day (~$105) reclaim is the confirmation, not the entry

Invalidation: the $84 shelf fails — then the fuel-cycle unwind has further to run

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
Not gradedNot graded
CEGWAIT2026-07-17 · resolved:closedOriginal call

the merchant bellwether needs a turn signature, not a dip-buy — a base under the 50-day (~$269), then a reclaim that holds with a higher low

Invalidation: a PJM-style revenue cap lands on its core markets, or the base breaks to new lows below the July shelf

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
Not gradedNot graded
DUKWAIT2026-07-17 · resolved:invalidatedOriginal call

the one working expression — regulated rate-base growth from the same demand; a close at a fresh 52-week high that holds confirms the leadership

Invalidation: loses the 200-day (~$123) — the defensive bid is gone

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
Not gradedNot graded
LEUWAIT2026-07-17 · openOriginal call

only after a full-quarter base — the enrichment monopoly story is intact but the stock is in a −68%-from-high collapse; a 50-day (~$177) reclaim after a multi-week base is the earliest signal worth acting on

Invalidation: HALEU contract flow stalls, or the base never forms and lower lows continue

Not recordedReview 2026-10-01
Not gradedNot graded
TLNWAIT2026-07-17 · resolved:invalidatedOriginal call

the strongest tape of the merchants — hold the $360 shelf and the 200-day (~$371), then clear the 20-day (~$394) to signal the pullback resolved up

Invalidation: a close below $360 turns the pullback into a breakdown

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
Not gradedNot graded
VSTWAIT2026-07-17 · resolved:hitOriginal call

reclaim the 200-day (~$166) and hold it — first sign the derate is done

Invalidation: capacity-revenue caps spread to ERCOT/PJM exposure, or price breaks down from the current shelf instead of basing

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
Not gradedNot graded
APLDWAIT2026-07-08 · resolved:invalidatedOriginal call

the margin inflection (gross profit $4M → $54M in five quarters) needs one more print to be a trend, plus evidence of tenants beyond CoreWeave

Invalidation: gross margin rolls back over the next print, or a break below $28 (the one-year VWAP and support shelf)

Not recordedReview 2026-08-15
Not gradedNot graded
AXTIPASS2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

reopen only if it bases above its 200-day (~$42.55) for a full quarter AND revenue inflects — a collapsed 25x parabolic with sub-$100M revenue and operating losses is a lottery aftermath, not a trend

Invalidation: n/a — not owned; the pass is wrong if the substrate cycle produces a durable base and profitability

Not recordedReview 2026-10-01
Not gradedNot graded
CGNXBUY2026-07-08 · resolved:hitOriginal call

the steady one — EPS tripled over three quarters on a wire-flagged margin inflection and the tape barely flinched; buy the 20-day reclaim (~$66)

Invalidation: a finish under the 200-day (~$49) — the machine-vision recovery thesis is dead there

Not recordedReview 2026-08-15
+0.60 pp vs SPY-1.03 pp vs SPY
CIFRPASS2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

reopen only on revenue inflecting up AND visible de-leveraging of the $4.4B debt stack

Invalidation: n/a — not owned; the pass is wrong if hosting revenue ramps against falling leverage

Not recordedReview 2026-10-01
Not gradedNot graded
CORZPASS2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

reopen on a recapitalization that restores positive equity with the CoreWeave tenancy intact

Invalidation: n/a — not owned

Not recordedReview 2026-10-01
Not gradedNot graded
CRDOBUY2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

elite fundamentals (33% operating margin on $1.34B FY26 revenue) with the least-damaged tape in the sweep — already flagging under its 20-day; buy the reclaim (~$255.50)

Invalidation: a finish under the 200-day (~$160) — until then pullbacks are digestion in an intact uptrend

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
-7.14 pp vs SPY-19.16 pp vs SPY
CRWVPASS2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

reopen only on a financing regime change — interest expense stabilizing while revenue keeps compounding, and a reclaimed $98–100 (the point-of-control / 200-day cluster)

Invalidation: n/a — not owned; the pass is wrong if CRWV re-rates through $100 on improving coverage

Not recordedReview 2026-10-01
Not gradedNot graded
EQTWAIT2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

the fundamentals are the best in the sweep (net income nearly quadrupled in two quarters) but the tape trades below its 200-day — watch for the reclaim of the ~$55.60 cluster (50-day, 200-day, one-year VWAP)

Invalidation: gas strip rolling over while price stays below the 200-day through the October print

Not recordedReview 2026-10-01
Not gradedNot graded
HUTPASS2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

reopen on a financed capacity deal that closes the gap between $160M of cash and gigawatt-scale ambitions

Invalidation: n/a — not owned; the pass is wrong if the power-first strategy lands funding without heavy dilution

Not recordedReview 2026-10-01
Not gradedNot graded
IRENBUY2026-07-08 · resolved:invalidatedOriginal call

the July 7 bounce (+13% on the Jefferies initiation and closed Nostrum deal) needs a flag first — buy the reclaim of the $44.50 one-year point-of-control, not the pop

Invalidation: a finish back under ~$35, the level the bounce launched from — that says the bottom failed

Not recordedReview 2026-08-31
-7.88 pp vs SPY-8.54 pp vs SPY
KGSBUY2026-07-08 · resolved:invalidatedOriginal call

the sleeper — record Q1, raised full-year guidance to include the Distributed Power acquisition, and a 300–500MW/yr power-generation growth outlook through 2030; buy the 50-day reclaim (~$70)

Invalidation: a finish under $57.50 (top of the prior value area) says the datacenter-power re-rate failed

Not recordedReview 2026-08-15
-18.00 pp vs SPY-24.52 pp vs SPY
LASRBUY2026-07-08 · resolved:hitOriginal call

defense photonics inflected to GAAP profit on +55% revenue with record defense product sales — buy the reclaim of $65.50 (the one-year point of control)

Invalidation: a finish under the ~$51 cluster (200-day and one-year VWAP), or defense revenue momentum stalling at the next print

Not recordedReview 2026-08-15
-8.03 pp vs SPY-36.30 pp vs SPY
MXLWAIT2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

wire-flagged inflection but already a 4.5x over the year and −16% this week on no news we can find — needs the flag to hold; interest returns above the 20-day (~$91)

Invalidation: a finish under the one-year VWAP (~$50.66) unwinds the entire re-rate

Not recordedReview 2026-08-15
Not gradedNot graded
NBISBUY2026-07-08 · resolved:closedOriginal call

pullback within an intact uptrend — buy the 50-day reclaim at ~$217, which says the seven-day air pocket resolved

Invalidation: a finish under the 200-day (~$134) — at that point the hypergrowth story is repricing, not consolidating

Not recordedReview 2026-08-31
-16.91 pp vs SPY+10.90 pp vs SPY
TERBUY2026-07-08 · resolved:hitOriginal call

the −21% week has no company event behind it — Q1 revenue rose 87% with a 21% EPS beat and the wire flagged the margin inflection; buy the 50-day reclaim (~$383), with the July 28 print as the catalyst

Invalidation: a finish under the 200-day (~$270), or the July 28 print showing the 'lumpy, concentrated among large customers' risk arriving early

Not recordedReview 2026-08-15
+4.15 pp vs SPY+17.88 pp vs SPY
WULFWAIT2026-07-08 · resolved:invalidatedOriginal call

the $2.63B war chest has to start converting into hosting revenue on the P&L — watch the Q2 print; a 50-day reclaim (~$24.30) alongside it upgrades this to a buy candidate

Invalidation: cash burn without contracted revenue landing by the Q3 print, or a breakdown under the $15.67 support shelf

Not recordedReview 2026-08-15
Not gradedNot graded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

Counter-case to persistent optical and memory gains: by March 2027, AI spending reductions and weaker supplier orders reverse the pricing or margin gains those campaigns expect.

Why now
Financing demands and delivery obligations warrant an explicit counter-case. Current supplier and cloud growth challenge immediate-collapse claims; no broad spending-cut conclusion is established.
In scope
Verified spending revisions, cancellations and supplier pricing or margins · Delivery economics and financing as possible transmission channels
Out of scope
Inferring spending cuts from stock dispersion or GAAP losses alone · Treating a short-term pullback as the end of long-term AI demand · Issuance calendars without a filed, measurable event
Expected horizon
Through March 2027, matching the next two reporting cycles of the optical and memory cases.
What supports it
A disclosed spending reduction is followed by corroborating order deterioration and pricing or margin reversals in optical or memory suppliers
What would break it
Through March 2027, customers maintain spending and both core supplier groups sustain orders and margins without the proposed reversal
Curated instrumentsGOOGLMSFTCRWVNBIS

Next review 2026-10-30 · Earlier on a verified capital-spending guide-down or a customer cancellation disclosed in a filing or on an earnings call; earlier also on a new Oracle equity or convertible authorisation, since the $20 billion at-the-market program is exhausted and a replacement filing would confirm the funding gap is structural rather than a timing effect. Otherwise review at the October hyperscaler reporting cycle, beginning with Microsoft's scheduled October 28 report (Microsoft investor-relations calendar, 2:30 PM PT), and test the financing channel — issuance terms, prepayment recurrence and credit marks — separately from the order channel. Aggregator-reported capital-spending figures do not satisfy the disclosure test; a filing or transcript does.

Research ideas

All 0 ideas →

Issued calls · returns compare the symbol with SPY after 30 and 90 days. Positive excess supports a BUY; negative excess supports TRIM or SELL. WAIT and research ideas have no score. These are call outcomes, not a campaign return.

Entry and invalidationHorizon / review30 days90 days
CEGWAIT2026-10-09 · openOriginal call

A pullback that holds above the 200-day average ($286.14 at the Oct 9 close) while RSI cools below 55, then a settled close above $300.40, the October 6 close on the Google agreement

Invalidation: A settled close below the 200-day average ($286.14 at the Oct 9 close), or a third-quarter report (expected around Nov 9, provider date) that does not confirm the Google agreement's terms

Not recordedReview 2026-11-13
Not gradedNot graded
CEGWAIT2026-07-19 · resolved:closedOriginal call

reclaim the 20-day (~$256) with hyperscaler spending language intact on the Jul 29–30 prints

Invalidation: capex language softens and the July shelf breaks — then the contracted-electrons bid is repricing too

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
GEVWAIT2026-07-19 · resolved:closedOriginal call

held the AI unwind at −5%; reclaim the 20-day (~$1,085) and print a higher low

Invalidation: loses the July low — the complement bid was narrower than the month suggested

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
LEUWAIT2026-07-19 · openOriginal call

first higher low after a clean Jul 29–30 capex read — the −18% month is a beta markdown, and the entry is print-gated, not chart-gated

Invalidation: lower lows after capex language holds firm — then the fuel-cycle derate is regime, not beta

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
MUWAIT2026-07-18 · resolved:closedOriginal call

Friday printed a reversal bar (low $804, closed $848.95); a close above that bar's high ($903.93) confirms it — the trend-hold entry itself still needs the base and a 20-day reclaim ($1,023)

Invalidation: a close below Friday's low ($804) voids the reversal; the knife is still falling

Not recordedReview 2026-08-14
Not gradedNot graded
NVDAWAIT2026-07-18 · resolved:closedOriginal call

the general never broke (−3.7% in 30 days vs the ETF's −15.7%); a reclaim of its 50-day ($209.81) is the complex-repair signal — the leader turns first

Invalidation: a close below the $186.48 volume shelf means the general finally fell and the whole complex read resets bearish

Not recordedReview 2026-08-14
Not gradedNot graded
SMHWAIT2026-07-18 · openOriginal call

the complex switch: first close back above the 50-day ($597.33) after a higher low, confirmed through the 20-day ($610.93); until then every bounce is a bounce inside a downtrend

Invalidation: a close below Friday's low ($536.81) means the bounce attempt failed and the next leg down is open

Not recordedReview 2026-08-14
Not gradedNot graded
STXWAIT2026-07-18 · resolved:closedOriginal call

the complex's only accumulation-shaped bar: +5.7% on 1.35× volume, closed near the high after touching $700.39; above Friday's high ($808.65) with the July 28 print ahead, the bounce has legs

Invalidation: a close below $700.39 means Friday was a dead-cat, not a turn

Not recordedReview 2026-08-14
Not gradedNot graded
ARMWAIT2026-07-17 · resolved:hitOriginal call

reclaim the pre-registered $270 line and hold it — the trigger the thesis flag broke this week, now the recovery tell

Invalidation: lower lows continue below $270 after the prints — then the derate is regime, not scare

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
MUWAIT2026-07-17 · resolved:closedOriginal call

gated on the prints, not the chart — a storage/memory print (STX Jul 28, WDC Jul 29, SNDK Aug 5) showing DRAM/NAND pricing intact, plus a first higher low

Invalidation: a print that shows pricing momentum actually rolling — then the derate was early, not wrong

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
NVDAWAIT2026-07-17 · resolved:closedOriginal call

the R1 playbook leg — hold the 20-day retest (~$202) through the July 28–29 storage prints, then a higher low; the efficiency-scare component tends to mean-revert if the fundamentals hold

Invalidation: the retest fails and the pullback becomes a breakdown below the July shelf, or hyperscaler capex language actually softens on the July 29–30 prints

Not recordedReview 2026-08-08
Not gradedNot graded
MDBBUY2026-07-08 · resolved:invalidatedOriginal call

the quality expression of the rotation — already back above all three moving averages with RSI under 60 and half a billion of operating cash flow; buyable at structure, add on strength over the 20-day (~$338 now support)

Invalidation: a finish under the 50-day (~$320) puts it back in the broken cohort; under the one-year VWAP (~$310) the rotation call was early

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
+7.22 pp vs SPY-4.16 pp vs SPY
OKTAPASS2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

the rotation's confirming leader — but RSI 78 and 3% off its high is chasing; reopen on the first orderly pullback that holds the 50-day

Invalidation: n/a — not owned; the pass is a timing pass, not a thesis pass

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
Not gradedNot graded
WDAYWAIT2026-07-08 · openOriginal call

the earnings proof-point of the rotation (beat + raised subscription guide) but still in a downtrend, 43% off its high — watch for a base; this is a lane signal, not yet an entry

Invalidation: the bounce fades below the June low with the lane's 7-day breadth rolling back under 50%

Not recordedReview 2026-09-15
Not gradedNot graded

Shared evidence

11 sources linked to both campaigns. Each interpretation belongs to its own claim.

AI Money Bought Running Power Plants and Sold the Build-Out

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · No interpretation recorded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · No interpretation recorded

Read source →
2026-09-11-orcl-company-profile

AI power: generation and grid equipment

supports · Oracle's first quarter of fiscal 2027 supports the electricity-demand leg with filed, dated commitment and supplies the caution the review condition asked for. The 10-Q discloses $34.150B of unconditional purchase and other obligations that the filing says relate primarily to component supply and power supply arrangements for data centers, plus $288B of not-yet-commenced data-center leases on fifteen-to-nineteen-year terms, extending contracted power demand well past this campaign's twelve-to-thirty-six-month horizon. On conversion it is explicit the other way: the results release quantifies 850 megawatts of capacity delivered in the quarter and more than 300,000 GPUs, while the quarterly report quantifies no megawatt figure at all, contracted or energised. Commitment is documented; energisation cannot be verified from the filings. Recorded as evidence for contracted demand, not as proof of delivered output.

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

challenges · Oracle's first quarter of fiscal 2027 challenges the reversal case on the leg the claim rests on: capital expenditure of $28.499B, fiscal 2027 guided above fiscal 2026's $55.663B, more than $30B of new AI cloud contracts and remaining performance obligations of $664B against $455B a year earlier are spending maintained and raised, and the market attributed the day's two best S&P 500 performers to the print. It supplies real evidence on the scope's financing transmission channel rather than its order channel: the $20B at-the-market program fully drawn for 141 million shares, $11.363B of customer prepayments with a significant financing component, free cash flow of -$5.396B for a fifth consecutive quarter, and $125.0B of senior notes marked at $105.7B fair value at August 31 against $114.4B on $128.1B at May 31. Cost of money is not a disclosed spending reduction; the case's supports condition is not met.

Campaign scope review: a smaller working set

AI power: generation and grid equipment

notebook · Keep the evidenced upstream electricity claim; remove cloud hosts and downstream sockets from its curated instruments.

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

notebook · Replace the vague crowded-trade lens with a falsifiable opposing case; monitoring records uncertainty, not a bearish desk call.

Read source →
CoreWeave: delivered growth and financing demands

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · Cloud delivery and contracted power provide customer context, not automatic admission of a financed cloud operator into the upstream equipment case.

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · Revenue and infrastructure growth coexist with financing demands. The financing channel is worth testing, but neither losses nor funding alone demonstrate spending cuts or a supplier reversal.

Read source →
GE Vernova: power and grid orders

AI power: generation and grid equipment

supports · Power and grid orders provide direct evidence for the upstream equipment case. Delivery, margins and cancellation terms remain the renewal tests; they do not establish every campus’s financing.

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

challenges · Current upstream order growth challenges an immediate spending-collapse claim. Long-lived bookings can outlast short-cycle cuts, so this is not a verdict on future memory or optical orders.

Read source →
Fifteen of twenty broke together

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · No interpretation recorded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · No interpretation recorded

Read source →
Alphabet Q2: $44.9B quarterly capex, $180-190B FY guide, 2027 'significantly increases'

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · No interpretation recorded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · No interpretation recorded

Read source →
What to Own When Intelligence Is Free

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · No interpretation recorded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · No interpretation recorded

Read source →
r/wallstreetbets — Meta's Louisiana data center to surpass $250B price tag

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · No interpretation recorded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · No interpretation recorded

Read source →
Investigation — Neocloud demand absorption vs AI capex digestion

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · No interpretation recorded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · No interpretation recorded

Read source →
Week in Review — The Rotation Gets a Name (week ending 2026-06-26)

AI power: generation and grid equipment

context · No interpretation recorded

AI spending: the supplier earnings reversal case

context · No interpretation recorded

Read source →