Defense Contractors Scan
Defense Contractors Scan
Sharp split inside the group: the ETFs (ITA RSI 57, strong-up; DFEN RSI 56, +16.5% 3M; PPA RSI 49, strong-up) hold up, but the prime single-names are rolling over. NOC is the broken extreme — RSI 30.9, -27.2% 3M, -35% from high, collapse regime, below all MAs. LMT (RSI 43, strong-down, death cross, -27% from high) and LHX (RSI 38.5, strong-down, death cross) are the other weak primes. RTX (RSI 55.9, +4.3% 30D, up regime) and BWXT (54.9, basing near +266% 5y) are the relative-strength single-names. LEU sits here too — uranium-enrichment collapse (RSI 48, -29.5% vs SMA200, -62.5% from high) tracking the broad uranium breakdown. No CONFIRMED-BREAKOUT entry; the ETFs are holds, the primes are pullback/collapse watches.
Latest bar 2026-06-25 (all names fresh per summary ). READ-ONLY scan: all figures from pre-computed
summaries/defense-contractors.json.
Quick Snapshot
| Signal | Reading |
|---|---|
| Overall | 🟡 Split — defense ETFs (ITA/DFEN/PPA) hold strong-up regimes, but the primes diverge: NOC collapse (RSI 31, -27% 3M), LMT/LHX strong-down with death crosses. RTX + BWXT are the only single-name relative strength. LEU (uranium) in collapse |
| Key insight | The group is ETF-strong / prime-weak. NOC is the broken extreme (RSI 30.9, collapse, -35% from high) — washed but trend-broken, falling-knife not quality-oversold. RTX (RSI 56, +4.3% 30D, above all MAs) is the cleanest single-name; LEU is a uranium story riding the broad uranium wreck, not a defense tell |
Price Table
| Stock | Price | RSI | vs SMA20 | 7D% | 30D% | 3M% | 52wkHi% | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITA | $237.64 | 57.2 | +1.8% | -1.38% | +3.62% | +8.03% | -5.19% | 🔒 Hold |
| RTX | $186.59 | 55.9 | +2.7% | -1.17% | +4.26% | -2.84% | -13.01% | 🔒 Hold |
| DFEN | $75.50 | 55.7 | +4.2% | -4.44% | +8.15% | +16.46% | -22.76% | 🔒 Hold |
| BWXT | $205.18 | 54.9 | +5.0% | +0.39% | +0.39% | +0.18% | -15.15% | 🔒 Hold |
| PPA | $171.64 | 48.9 | -1.0% | -2.21% | -1.30% | +2.53% | -7.87% | 🔒 Hold |
| LEU | $174.10 | 48.4 | -0.1% | -6.00% | -5.05% | -9.94% | -62.50% | 🔍 Watch |
| GD | $344.10 | 47.3 | -1.2% | -3.22% | -0.16% | -2.70% | -6.93% | 🔍 Watch |
| BA | $219.20 | 48.3 | -0.5% | -0.72% | +0.14% | +12.78% | -13.82% | 🔍 Watch |
| LMT | $504.82 | 43.1 | -3.0% | -3.83% | -4.65% | -19.02% | -27.05% | 🔍 Watch |
| LHX | $287.64 | 38.5 | -5.3% | -3.75% | -7.87% | -17.33% | -24.15% | 🔍 Watch |
| NOC | $501.57 | 30.9 ↓ | -6.6% | -4.23% | -9.52% | -27.20% | -35.20% | ❌ Don't Buy |
Tier Analysis
Strong-Up ETFs / Hold (RSI 49-57): ITA (RSI 57.2, strong-up, golden cross, +8.0% 3M, +7.4% vs SMA200, near 52wk high) is the cleanest expression of the group — the aggregate holds an uptrend even as primes wobble. DFEN (3x leveraged, RSI 55.7, up regime, +16.5% 3M, +9.9% vs SMA200) and PPA (RSI 48.9, strong-up, golden cross, +4.0% vs SMA200) round out the ETF holds. The ETFs are the way to stay long the theme without single-prime risk.
Single-Name Relative Strength / Hold (RSI 55-56): RTX (RSI 55.9, up regime, +4.3% 30D, above all three MAs +2.6% vs SMA200, -13% from high) is the strongest prime — only one in an up regime with positive 30D. BWXT (54.9, basing, +5.0% vs SMA20, flat 30D/3M but +266% 5y, +135% alpha3y) is consolidating after a huge run — constructive base, watch for breakout.
Pullback / Watch (RSI 38-48): GD (RSI 47.3, basing, death cross but only -6.9% from high — mild), BA (48.3, pullback, +12.8% 3M, golden cross intact — the recovery name basing). LMT (RSI 43.1, strong-down, death cross, -19.0% 3M, -27% from high, below all MAs -5.4% vs SMA200) and LHX (38.5, strong-down, death cross, -17.3% 3M, -24% from high, -8.4% vs SMA200) are the weak primes — both trend-broken pullbacks, not yet washed enough to be quality-oversold.
Uranium Collapse / Watch (RSI 48): LEU (RSI 48.4, strong-down, death cross, -9.9% 3M, -29.5% vs SMA200, -62.5% from high, collapse regime) — this is a uranium-enrichment name tracking the broad uranium breakdown (see URA/UUUU in macro/geopolitical scans), not a defense-spending tell. Despite the collapse it still carries +358% alpha3y — a parabolic name deep in a drawdown, NOT a quality-oversold defense entry.
Collapse / Don't Buy (RSI 31): NOC (RSI 30.9, collapse regime, -27.2% 3M, -9.5% 30D, -35.2% from high, below all MAs -17.8% vs SMA200, death cross) — the broken extreme. Most-oversold name in the group but trend is fully broken; this is a falling knife, not OVERSOLD-QUALITY (it is below SMA200, no golden cross). Avoid until it bases and reclaims.
Entry-Hunt Tags
- CONFIRMED-BREAKOUT / Hold: none clean. ITA (RSI 57, strong-up, near high) and RTX (56, up, above all MAs) are the closest — holds, not fresh breakouts; not extended.
- OVERSOLD-QUALITY: none. NOC (RSI 31) and LHX (38.5) are the most-oversold but BOTH below SMA200 with death crosses — they fail the above-SMA200/golden-cross test, so they are BROKEN, not quality-oversold.
- BROKEN / AVOID: NOC (RSI 31, collapse, -35% from high, below all MAs), LMT (43, strong-down, death cross, -27% from high), LHX (38.5, strong-down, death cross), LEU (48, collapse, -62.5% from high — uranium not defense).
- EXTENDED / TRIM: none — no name is RSI>75 or >30% above SMA200; the group is in pullback, not euphoria.
Entry Zones
| Stock | Price | RSI | 3M% | Setup |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX | $186.59 | 55.9 | -2.84% | Strongest prime — up regime, above all MAs, +4.3% 30D; -13% from high gives room. The single-name to watch if defense re-rates; constructive now |
| ITA | $237.64 | 57.2 | +8.03% | ETF holding strong-up near 52wk high — the way to own the theme without prime-specific risk; hold, add on pullbacks to SMA50 (~$227) |
| BWXT | $205.18 | 54.9 | +0.18% | Basing after +266% 5y run (+5% vs SMA20); flat 3M consolidation — watch for breakout from this base, not yet confirmed |
| NOC | $501.57 | 30.9 ↓ | -27.20% | Collapse, -35% from high, below all MAs — most-oversold but trend-broken; NOT a dip-buy. Needs a base + SMA200 ($610) reclaim, far away — avoid |
Action Matrix
| Action | Stocks | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 🔒 HOLD | ITA, DFEN, PPA | Defense ETFs in strong-up / up regimes — own the theme via the basket, not the weak primes |
| 🔒 HOLD | RTX, BWXT | Single-name relative strength — RTX up regime above all MAs; BWXT basing after big run |
| 🔍 WATCH | GD, BA | Mild pullbacks — GD only -6.9% from high; BA +12.8% 3M recovery basing with golden cross |
| 🔍 WATCH | LMT, LHX | Strong-down primes with death crosses, -17% to -19% 3M — trend-broken; wait for base, not falling-knife catch |
| 🔍 WATCH | LEU | Uranium-enrichment collapse (-62.5% from high) riding the broad uranium wreck — not a defense tell |
| ❌ DON'T BUY | NOC | RSI 31 collapse, -35% from high, below all MAs — falling knife, not quality-oversold |
What Changed
- ETF-vs-prime split widened — ITA/DFEN/PPA hold strong-up while NOC/LMT/LHX roll over; the basket is healthier than the average prime.
- NOC deteriorated to collapse — RSI 30.9, -27.2% 3M, -35% from high, below all MAs — the group's broken extreme.
- RTX is the lone up-regime prime — +4.3% 30D, above all three MAs; relative-strength leader among single names.
- LMT/LHX strong-down with death crosses — both trend-broken (-17% to -19% 3M), the legacy-prime weakness.
- LEU collapse tracks uranium, not defense — -62.5% from high, -29.5% vs SMA200; cross-references URA/UUUU breakdown in macro/geopolitical scans.
The Gold
Key Discoveries
| Discovery | Implication |
|---|---|
| Defense ETFs (ITA/DFEN/PPA) hold strong-up while primes NOC/LMT/LHX break down | Own the theme through the basket — single-prime idiosyncratic weakness (program/margin/order-flow) is hitting the legacy names, not the sector trend |
| NOC, LMT, LHX all below SMA200 with death crosses while RTX is above all MAs | The "defense oversold" names fail the quality test (below 200-day) — RTX is the only prime where an uptrend is intact; the others are falling knives |
| LEU's -62.5%-from-high collapse mirrors URA/UUUU in the commodity scans | LEU here is a uranium-cycle expression, not defense-budget — route its read to the nuclear-fuel-cycle lane, don't double-count as defense weakness |
Mistakes (Don't Repeat)
| Mistake | Lesson |
|---|---|
| Buying NOC on "RSI 31 oversold defense name" | Collapse regime below all MAs, -35% from high — oversold + trend-broken is avoid; defense oversold ≠ quality dip when it's below SMA200 |
| Treating LMT/LHX as value at -27%/-24% from high | Both strong-down with death crosses — the drawdown is the trend, not a discount; wait for a base + reclaim |
Open Questions
- What is driving NOC's collapse (-27% 3M) vs RTX's strength (+4.3% 30D) — program-specific (B-21/Sentinel), margin, or order timing? (needs event verify — not in this scan)
- Is the ETF-vs-prime divergence a flows story (passive bid on ITA) or genuine differentiation that favors RTX/BWXT? (cross-check vs drone-defense / news)
- Does LEU belong in defense-contractors at all, or should it route fully to nuclear-fuel-cycle given its commodity-driven collapse? (taxonomy follow-up)
Related
10 eventsNo direct external sources are attached to this read.